Scientists claim Carbon found in 3.95bn-year-old rocks, earliest evidence of life


Another sing of life on earth found by Japan-based researchers have found carbon fragments in 3.95-billion-year-old rocks in Canada, claiming it to be the oldest-known life evidence on Earth. The team said it found same carbon isotope ratios seen in living organisms. The find is being scrutinized as some scientists believe, until 3.8 billion years ago, several space bodies crashed into Earth, making it difficult to create life.

Life may have gained a foothold on Earth more than 4 Billion years ago, according to researchers who believe that fragments of carbon found in rocks in Canada are remnants of ancient organisms.

Researchers in Japan analysed graphite particles in rocks from the Sag lek region of northern Labrador and found that they contained potential traces of life. In work last year, the team dated the band of rocks to 3.95 billion years old.

The claim that these rocks contain remnants of life now faces intense scrutiny from other scientists, but if the research published in Nature stands up, it suggests that the first organisms to emerge on Earth did so during one of the most violent periods in the planet’s history. Until 3.8bn years ago, the Earth was pounded by asteroids and comets left over from the formation of the solar system.

Yuji Sano, a senior researcher at the University of Tokyo, said that until now the oldest evidence for life on Earth stood at 3.8bn years, and coincided with the end of the so-called Late Heavy Bombardment. “It may be difficult to create life before 3.8 billion  years ago due to the bombardment, which may destroy early life,” he said. “But now it is 4bn years. Life started on Earth during the heavy bombardment of meteorites, which is amazing.”

Or perhaps it is not. The Japanese team base their claims on the sole discovery that some pieces of graphite bore the same carbon isotope ratios that are seen in living organisms. Life favors the lighter version of carbon, called carbon-12, over the heavier version, carbon-13, and when it dies, becomes sludge, and eventually forms rock, the material preserves the telltale carbon signature. But graphite can form with a skewed ratio of carbon isotopes without life’s helping hand. It can happen through the glacial action of Geo chemical processes or crash-land in meteorites.

“There may be a lot of people who are not convinced because their conclusions are based on one line of evidence,” said Matthew Dodd, a PhD student and Geo chemist at University College London. Earlier this year Dodd and his supervisor, Dominic Papineau, reported what might be the world’s oldest fossils from nearby rock formations in Canada. Dodd said he agreed with the Japanese team’s findings, but said the results might be more convincing if the scientists had gathered more evidence to support their claim.

Other scientists have more serious concerns. Martin Whitehouse, at the Swedish Museum of Natural History, doubts that the graphite is so old. The date of the rocks in the region is based on measurements of tiny particles of a mineral called zircon. But Whitehouse says the scientists used the oldest age from zircon that was kilometres away from where many of the graphite samples came from. “Regardless of the veracity of the biogenic evidence from the graphite, the claim that it is the oldest requires that the geochronology is watertight. If it’s younger than about 3.8bn years, it isn’t very exciting anymore.” He added: “I would say this fails the first test of proving an oldest anything in a region where igneous rocks have a range of ages between 3.9 and 3.7bn years old.” Minik Rosing, a geologist at the Natural History Museum of Denmark, also questioned the age of the graphite. “The problem is, they assign this very old age to everything,” he said.

If the work does hold up to further scrutiny, it will mark a milestone in scientists’ understanding of the earliest life on Earth. The oceans are thought to have formed 4.3bn years ago. If life gained a foothold 4bn years ago, it leaves a narrow window, by geological standards, for life to emerge.

“A lot of people think that 3.8bn years ago and older, we would have had a lot of impacts from meteorites as the solar system was still calming down from its formation, and these frequent, large impacts would have sterilised the surface of Earth, making it very difficult for life to survive. However, you can argue on contrary, that impact events produce very nice habitats potentially for the emergence of life on earth,” said Dodd. “If they are right, and this is life at 4bn years ago, it’s saying life can begin and make ends meet in a very hostile environment.”

According to Sano, similar tests could be used to identity the types of microbes that left the graphite behind, and even find evidence for life elsewhere. “If we have a suitable sample, such as a fresh Martian meteorite, we may discuss life on Mars,” he said.

Since you’re here …

… we have a small favour to ask. More people are reading the Guardian than ever but advertising revenues across the media are falling fast. And unlike many news organisations, we haven’t put up a paywall – we want to keep our journalism as open as we can. So you can see why we need to ask for your help. The Guardian’s independent, investigative journalism takes a lot of time, money and hard work to produce. But we do it because we believe our perspective matters – because it might well be your perspective, too.

I appreciate there not being a paywall: it is more democratic for the media to be available for all and not a commodity to be purchased by a few. I’m happy to make a contribution so others with less means still have access to information. Thomasine F-R.

If everyone who reads our reporting, who likes it, helps to support it, our future would be much more secure.

read more at >>>>>  The Guardian


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here